PPRNet Practice Guidelines

Practice
guideline: Pap test in women
>=18 years of age without hysterectomies at least every 3 years
The USPSTF strongly
recommends screening for cervical cancer in women who have been sexually active
and have a cervix. The USPSTF found good evidence from multiple observational
studies that screening with cervical cytology (Pap smears) reduces incidence of
and mortality from cervical cancer. Direct evidence to determine the optimal
starting and stopping age and interval for screening is limited. Indirect
evidence suggests most of the benefit can be obtained by beginning screening
within 3 years of onset of sexual activity or age 21 (whichever comes first)
and screening at least every 3 years. The USPSTF found no direct evidence that
annual screening achieves better outcomes than screening every 3 years.
Modeling studies suggest little added benefit of more frequent screening for
most women. The majority of cervical cancers in the United States occur in
women who have never been screened or who have not been screened within the
past 5 years; additional cases occur in women who do not receive appropriate
follow-up after an abnormal Pap smear. Because sensitivity of a single Pap test
for high-grade lesions may only be 60-80 percent; however, most organizations
in the United States recommend that annual Pap smears be performed until a
specified number (usually two or three) are cytologically normal before
lengthening the screening interval. The USPSTF concludes that the benefits of
screening substantially outweigh potential harms.
Discontinuation
of cervical cancer screening in older women is appropriate, provided women have
had adequate recent screening with normal Pap results. The optimal age to
discontinue screening is not clear, but risk of cervical cancer and yield of
screening decline steadily through middle age. The USPSTF found evidence that
yield of screening was low in previously screened women after age 65. New
American Cancer Society (ACS) recommendations suggest stopping cervical cancer
screening at age 70. Screening is recommended in older women who have not been
previously screened, when information about previous screening is unavailable,
or when screening is unlikely to have occurred in the past (e.g., among women
from countries without screening programs). Evidence is limited to define
"adequate recent screening." The ACS guidelines recommend that older
women who have had three or more documented, consecutive, technically
satisfactory normal/negative cervical cytology tests, and who have had no
abnormal/positive cytology tests within the last 10 years, can safely stop
screening.
Discontinuation
of cytological screening after total hysterectomy for benign disease (e.g., no
evidence of cervical neoplasia or cancer) is appropriate given the low yield of
screening and the potential harms from false-positive results in this
population. Clinicians should confirm that a total hysterectomy was performed
(through surgical records or inspecting for absence of a cervix); screening may
be appropriate when the indications for hysterectomy are uncertain. ACS and
ACOG recommend continuing cytologic screening after hysterectomy for women with
a history of invasive cervical cancer or DES exposure due to increased risk for
vaginal neoplasms, but data on the yield of such screening are sparse.
Newer Food and
Drug Administration (FDA)-approved technologies, such as the liquid-based cytology
(e.g., ThinPrep®), may have improved sensitivity over conventional Pap smear
screening, but at a considerably higher cost and possibly with lower
specificity. Even if sensitivity is improved, modeling studies suggest these
methods are not likely to be cost-effective unless used with screening
intervals of 3 years or longer. Liquid-based cytology permits testing of
specimens for HPV, which may be useful in guiding management of women whose Pap
smear reveals atypical squamous cells. HPV DNA testing for primary cervical
cancer screening has not been approved by the FDA and its role in screening
remains uncertain i .
Additional resource: USPSTF Recommendations and Rationale
[i]
(pdf)
Practice guideline:
Periodic fecal occult blood testing (FOBT), sigmoidoscopy, or colonoscopy in patients >=50 years of age
The USPSTF
strongly recommends that clinicians screen men and women 50 years of age or
older for colorectal cancer. The USPSTF found fair to good evidence that
several screening methods are effective in reducing mortality from colorectal
cancer. There is good evidence that periodic fecal occult blood testing (FOBT)
reduces mortality from colorectal cancer and fair evidence that sigmoidoscopy
alone or in combination with FOBT reduces mortality. Efficacy of colonoscopy is
supported by its integral role in trials of FOBT, extrapolation from
sigmoidoscopy studies, limited case-control evidence, and the ability of
colonoscopy to inspect the proximal colon. Double-contrast barium enema offers
an alternative means of whole-bowel examination, but it is less sensitive than
colonoscopy, and there is no direct evidence that it is effective in reducing
mortality rates. The USPSTF found insufficient evidence that newer screening
technologies (for example, computed tomographic colography) are effective in
improving health outcomes.
There are insufficient
data to determine which strategy is best in terms of the balance of benefits
and potential harms or cost-effectiveness. Studies reviewed by the USPSTF
indicate that colorectal cancer screening is likely to be cost-effective (less
than $30,000 per additional year of life gained) regardless of the strategy
chosen ii iii
.
Additional resources:
USPSTF Recommendations
and Rationale
[iii]
(pdf)
USPSTF Summary of the Evidence
[iv]
(pdf)
The U.S. Preventive
Services Task Force (USPSTF) recommends screening mammography, with or without
clinical breast examination (CBE), every 1-2 years for women aged 40 and older.
The USPSTF found fair evidence that mammography screening every 12-33 months
significantly reduces mortality from breast cancer. The precise age at which
the benefits from screening mammography justify the potential harms is a
subjective judgment and should take into account patient preferences. Most, but
not all, studies indicate a mortality benefit for women undergoing mammography
at ages 40-49, but the delay in observed benefit in women younger than 50 makes
it difficult to determine the incremental benefit of beginning screening at age
40 rather than at age 50. For women
aged 40-49, available trials also have not reported a clear advantage of annual
mammography over biennial mammography. Nevertheless, some experts recommend
annual mammography based on the lower sensitivity of the test and on evidence
that tumors grow more rapidly in this age group. Evidence is strongest for
women aged 50-69, the age group generally included in screening trials. For
women aged 50 and older, there is little evidence to suggest that annual
mammography is more effective than mammography done every other year.
Clinicians should inform women about the potential benefits (reduced chance of
dying from breast cancer), potential harms (e.g., false-positive results,
unnecessary biopsies), and limitations of the test that apply to women their
age.
The precise age at which to discontinue
screening mammography is uncertain. Only two randomized controlled trials
enrolled women older than 69 and no trials enrolled women older than 74. Older
women face a higher probability of developing and dying from breast cancer but
also have a greater chance of dying from other causes. Women with comorbid
conditions that limit their life expectancy are unlikely to benefit from
screening.
Women who are at increased
risk for breast cancer (e.g., those with a family history of breast cancer in a
mother or sister, a previous breast biopsy revealing atypical hyperplasia, or
first childbirth after age 30) are more likely to benefit from regular
mammography than women at lower risk. The recommendation for women to begin
routine screening in their 40s is strengthened by a family history of breast
cancer having been diagnosed before menopause v .
Additional resources:
USPSTF Recommendations and Rationale
[v]
(pdf)
[i]
U.S. Preventive Services Task Force.
Screening for Cervical Cancer.
AHRQ Publication No. 03-515A, January 2003. Agency for Healthcare Research
and Quality, Rockville, MD. http://www.ahrq.gov/clinic/3rduspstf/cervicalcan/cervcanrr.htm.
[ii]
Walsh JM,
Terdiman JP. Colorectal
Cancer Screening: Scientific Review. JAMA 2003
289: 1288-1296.
[iii]
U.S. Preventive Services Task Force.
Screening for Colorectal Cancer: Recommendations
and Rationale. July 2002. Originally in Ann Intern Med 2002;137:129-31. Agency
for Healthcare Research and Quality, Rockville, MD. http://www.ahrq.gov/clinic/3rduspstf/colorectal/colorr.htm.
[iv]
Pignone M, Rich M, Teutsch
SM, Berg AO, Lohr KN. Screening for colorectal cancer in adults at average
risk: summary of the evidence for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force.
Ann Intern Med 2002 137:132-41.
[v]
Screening for Breast Cancer. Recommendations and Rationale.
February 2002. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Rockville, MD.
http://www.ahrq.gov/clinic/3rduspstf/breastcancer/brcanrr.htm,
[vi] Humphrey LL, Helfand M, Chan BKS, Woolf SH. Breast Cancer Screening. Summary of the Evidence. Originally in Ann Intern Med 2002;137:344-6.Agency for
Healthcare Research and Quality, Rockville, MD. http://www.ahrq.gov/clinic/3rduspstf/breastcancer/bcscrnsum1.htm.