| Spirituality and Health at MUSC |
| Learning Objectives of Integrated Spirituality and Medicine Curriculum at MUSC |
| Names, Degrees, and Academic Titles of Participating Faculty Members |
| Recent Spirituality Research at MUSC |
Learning Objectives
1.
Spirituality in Health Care,
elective course Years 1 and 2
Learning
Objectives:
(1)
Define and interpret the meaning of these important concepts: healing,
health, faith, spirituality, mindfulness, guilt, forgiveness, shame, suffering,
hope, care, grief, and virtue/human flourishing;
(2)
Learn how to know when it is appropriate or necessary to talk to a
patient about faith, how to handle religious issues in practice, and how to do a
spiritual assessment (spiritual history) with a patient;
(3)
Recover the traditions of religious reflection on birth, suffering,
well-being, and death, with application to issues in patient care and clinical
ethics; and
(4)
Learn effective and ethical ways to help patients activate spiritual
resources for healing and wellness, integrally related to the patient’s
cultural milieu and religious orientation.
.
Spirituality
is a vital component of health, as borne out by extensive research.
The
clinician’s ability to discern a patient’s spiritual values, personal
meanings and vital connections, and to respect and enhance these spiritual
dimensions in the care of the patient, may vastly increase therapeutic benefit.
By means of thorough, critical, and experiential understanding and
interpretation of key concepts from spiritual traditions (listed above), we lay
the foundation for a careful examination of the ways faith/spirituality and
science-based health care intersect in the research and clinical practice of
today’s doctor.
Specifically, the clinical conditions correlated with spiritual concepts
include pregnancy and childbirth, the good heart, chronic pain and illness or
disability, psychiatric illness, diabetes, addiction, and dying with cancer.
Since
this course was a winner of the Spirituality and Medicine Curricular Award in
1998 and with annual reports having been made, and because the syllabus is nine
pages long, we present here only this brief summary, considering that the course
has been carefully scrutinized.
The
course comprises 28 contact hours in seminar format, plus reading and
interviewing, for 2h credit.
We offer the course both Fall and Spring semesters. Enrollment is capped
at 15. Dr.
Keller is the Course Director and has been teaching the course for 11 years.
2.
Doctoring
I, Longitudinal Patient Care Experience (LPCE)
Learning
Objectives:
(1)
Consider the evidence for the premise that a patient’s values, beliefs,
and religious or spiritual practices affect their health and should be assessed
by the physician;
(2)
Learn how to assess patients’spirituality by taking a spiritual
history.
Dr.
Thiedke is Course Director for Doctoring I and II.
Working in small groups with preceptors, all entering medical students
have two practice sessions at the beginning of first semester where they learn
the components of the medical interview and practice doing it on each other.
They read and discuss two articles describing how to take a spiritual
history (using the HOPE acronym) and incorporate that in their initial learning
of how to take a medical history. In
a third session with standardized patients, each student performs the whole
interview including the spiritual history.
During the semester, students are assigned community physician-preceptors
also.
Note on evaluation: all Doctoring Curriculum course components and instructors are evaluated by students, under the direction of the Office of Curriculum and Evaluation, utilizing the standard PACE evaluation. The results are given to all course directors and instructors, analyzed, and used for refinement of the courses.
3.
Doctoring II, LPCE (continued, second
semester)
Learning
Objectives:
(1)
Reinforce the use of the spiritual assessment technique by incorporation
in interviews with patients in physicians’ offices in the community;
(2)
(projected) In the topical
seminars on addiction and on chronic pain, address ways that themes from
spiritual traditions (i.e., shame and grace, mindfulness meditation) illuminate
dynamics and suggest effective approaches to treatment.
Continuing
to work in small groups, students are in the offices of community physicians
where they have the opportunity to interview patients using the skills learned
earlier. They debrief in their groups where good technique is
reiterated. In connection with
topical sessions on addiction and chronic
pain, specific articles will be included in reading packets that integrate
relevant spiritual insights and skills into their learning, and into their
structured interviews with two sets of standardized patients.
(The readings and the rationale derive from units of the Spirituality
in Health Care course.)
4.
Doctoring
III, Introduction to Clinical Ethics
Learning Objectives:
(1)
Learn
about the empirical evidence and ongoing research in the area of faith or
spirituality and health, including how spirituality positively impacts healing;
(2)
Learn
ethical guidelines concerning disclosure of one’s own spiritual orientation,
seeking patient information of this nature, and praying/counseling with
patients;
(3) Explore ethical and religious implications of research on the “faith factor.”
Dr. Keller is Course Co-Director for Introduction to Clinical Ethics. One two-hour seminar (in small groups) in this third-semester core course is devoted to “Spirituality in Clinical Care.” Students and preceptors discuss readings (Puchalski and Romer, 2000; Sloan, 2000) and case studies that explore techniques of spiritual assessment and raise issues that could occur in the doctor-patient relationship. Attention is also given to the increasing body of research in this domain (including research conducted at MUSC), encouraging student questions and responses. The basic aims of this unit are to consolidate student learning of ways to incorporate spiritual assessment techniques into patient care and deal honestly with students’ questions or concerns related to this unconventional approach.
5.
Family
Medicine Core Clerkship
Learning Objectives:
(1)
Integrate
an awareness of the importance of a patient’s beliefs, values, religious and
spiritual practices into the actual care of patients.
(2)
Reflect
on ways in which a patient’s spiritual beliefs may shape their interaction
with the health care system, including physicians, nurses, hospital and
outpatient settings, diagnostic testing, and therapeutics.
(3)
Consider
ways in which the patient’s spiritual strengths might be identified
collaboratively and called into play to support healing.
The clerkship students meet twice a week in two-hour blocks to work through a series of problem-based learning cases that highlight common diagnoses and frequently encountered dilemmas in family practice. In this format, information about each case is given out a few pieces at a time. Students discuss appropriate diagnosis and treatment of the cases as new information is provided. Two of the cases include explicit spiritual material that the students are asked to consider when, as a group, they discuss treatment planning for that patient.
Dr. Thiedke directs the clerkship and shares the teaching of the PBL portion with other faculty clinicians (listed). The bulk of the student’s time in this clerkship involves seeing patients in the clinic with faculty and residents. Our computerized medical record prompts the interviewer to ask about a patient’s spiritual beliefs as part of the social history template. Each time students take a social history or witness a preceptor taking a social history, they are reminded that this information is part of a complete interview.
During the month, students are asked to identify a patient who expresses a viewpoint or belief that is new to them. Students then research this new idea on the Internet and elsewhere. They post the case on the medical student Website along with what they have learned about it and something about their own personal growth in examining an issue from a new viewpoint. Often this has to do with faith traditions that are different from their own. Students engage in interactive dialogue concerning similar experiences they have had. Designed to increase cultural sensitivity, this research and dialogue are mandatory and emphasized as critical learning.
At the end of the clerkship, part of the student
evaluation is done via a series of OSCE’s (Objective Structured Clinical
Exams). One OSCE involves a patient
who has recently been started on antihypertensive medication and has not been
taking it, preferring to try remedies that stem from his belief system.
For the student to succeed, he/she must take a thorough history and
assess pertinent religious factors.
6.
Family
Medicine Core Clerkship, Spirituality
and Medicine seminar
Learning Objectives:
(1)
Clarify
the distinction between religion and spirituality and the nature of both;
(2)
Consolidate
learning to date in the area of spirituality and medicine, step by step, and
draw more fully on personal meanings and experiences that influence how each
student doctor will interact with patients in this area.
This one-hour seminar with Dr. Keller is designed to lead students to explore
more deeply their personal spirituality (as distinct from religious
preferences), using a story by Rachel Naomi Remen, reflective exercises, and
research data to facilitate insight and discussion.
Placed at the beginning of the month, the seminar also prepares students
to profit maximally from the PBL and other aspects of the clerkship curriculum
as described above.
7. Fourth Year Psychiatry Clerkship, Power of the Spoken Word: Spirituality and Medicine Seminar
Learning Objectives:
(1)
Develop
skills in integrating spiritual assessment into the counseling of psychiatric
patients when appropriate;
(2)
Determine
what are appropriate interventions and appreciate what might be the consequences
if the patient’s spiritual concerns are not addressed.
Dr. King and Chaplain Wilson direct each monthly seminar in the fourth-year core Psychiatry clerkship. Readings and two case studies are given to clerkship students in advance of this two-hour didactic seminar. Students and preceptors analyze the cases using appropriate methods of spiritual assessment, and students discuss what kind of interventions are appropriate for each patient and why.
Finally, in regard to this proposed syllabus of integrated, coordinated courses taken by all medical students, all the courses that have been described are presently being taught. While we believe this accomplishment of the last three years has been significant, we emphatically believe that the Spirituality and Medicine Curriculum at MUSC is on the verge of expansion into a third phase.
Phase I was the conceptual development and teaching of the “taproot” course, Spirituality in Health Care, and auxiliary electives. Phase II was the initial creation of an integrated Spirituality and Medicine Curriculum in the core curriculum of medical school. Phase III focuses primarily on: (1) the expansion of formal teaching into two additional clinical clerkships, (2) more extensive faculty development for expanded teaching venues, (3) full integration of spirituality and medicine with the new (proposed) Palliative Care/End Of Life Program based in the MUSC Hollings Cancer Center, and (4) strategic publication and dissemination of ideas and models. With the enlarging core of faculty both prepared and dedicated to this enterprise, and with the institutional validation accorded by the Templeton award, we expect the next four years to be even more productive than the last.